Inspection is a necessary but non-value-adding activity whose purpose is to protect the customer from poor quality. We should therefore do as little as possible, upon condition that our inspection plan meets the customer’s requirement. Inspection plans with acceptance numbers of zero (c=0) minimize the sample size, albeit at the cost of a higher producer’s risk of rejecting lots at the specified acceptable quality level (AQL).
WHY SHOULD YOU ATTEND?
This presentation will show how to define c=0 plans whose customer protection is equivalent to that of the corresponding ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 (formerly MIL-STD 105) plan.
AREA COVERED
- How to use ANSI/ASQ Z1.4, including the definition of the sampling plan based on the inspection level, acceptable quality level (AQL), and lot size.
- How to use the standard’s switching rules to move between normal, tightened, and reduced inspection where appropriate
- Understand the benefits of double and multiple inspection plans in terms of their ability to accept good lots very quickly, and reject bad ones quickly, to reduce the average sample size.
- Convert any ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan into a zero acceptance number (c=0) plan that provides equivalent or better protection against poor quality at the rejectable quality level (RQL). (ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plans do not have formal RQLs, but we pretend that the nonconforming fraction for which the consumer’s risk of acceptance is 10% is the RQL). A c=0 plan has a smaller sample size than any single, double, multiple, or sequential sampling plan.
- Nothing is free in industrial statistics, though, and the cost of less inspection is a higher producer’s risk of rejecting lots at the AQL. A c=0 plan should therefore be used only when quality is far better than the specified AQL.
- Generate an operating characteristic (OC) curve that compares the protection from the c=0 plan to that of the original ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan to gain the customer’s agreement for the use of a c=0 plan.
Attendees will also receive an Excel spreadsheet that shows the operating characteristic (OC) curve for a c=0 plan and compares it to the original ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan. Attendees can replace the example’s specification with their own.
WHO WILL BENEFIT?
- Quality Managers
- Quality Inspectors
- Quality Technicians
- Quality Engineers
- Engineering Departments
This presentation will show how to define c=0 plans whose customer protection is equivalent to that of the corresponding ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 (formerly MIL-STD 105) plan.
- How to use ANSI/ASQ Z1.4, including the definition of the sampling plan based on the inspection level, acceptable quality level (AQL), and lot size.
- How to use the standard’s switching rules to move between normal, tightened, and reduced inspection where appropriate
- Understand the benefits of double and multiple inspection plans in terms of their ability to accept good lots very quickly, and reject bad ones quickly, to reduce the average sample size.
- Convert any ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan into a zero acceptance number (c=0) plan that provides equivalent or better protection against poor quality at the rejectable quality level (RQL). (ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plans do not have formal RQLs, but we pretend that the nonconforming fraction for which the consumer’s risk of acceptance is 10% is the RQL). A c=0 plan has a smaller sample size than any single, double, multiple, or sequential sampling plan.
- Nothing is free in industrial statistics, though, and the cost of less inspection is a higher producer’s risk of rejecting lots at the AQL. A c=0 plan should therefore be used only when quality is far better than the specified AQL.
- Generate an operating characteristic (OC) curve that compares the protection from the c=0 plan to that of the original ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan to gain the customer’s agreement for the use of a c=0 plan.
Attendees will also receive an Excel spreadsheet that shows the operating characteristic (OC) curve for a c=0 plan and compares it to the original ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 plan. Attendees can replace the example’s specification with their own.
- Quality Managers
- Quality Inspectors
- Quality Technicians
- Quality Engineers
- Engineering Departments
Speaker Profile
William A. Levinson, P.E., is the principal of Levinson Productivity Systems, P.C. He is an ASQ Fellow, Certified Quality Engineer, Quality Auditor, Quality Manager, Reliability Engineer, and Six Sigma Black Belt. He is also the author of several books on quality, productivity, and management, of which the most recent is The Expanded and Annotated My Life and Work: Henry Ford’s Universal Code for World-Class Success.
Upcoming Webinars
California Meal and Rest Breaks: What You Dont Know Can Cos…
Responding to EEOC Discrimination Charges-What's Your Busin…
Implementing an Effective Human Error Reduction Program
Conflict Resolution - Prevent, De-escalate, Resolve
When Employees Travel: Wage and Expense Rules Employers Mus…
With Mandatory Paid Leave Gaining Ground Is It Time To Do A…
Female to Female Hostility @Workplace: All you Need to Know
Form 1099-MISC and 1099-NEC Compliance Update 2024
Validation Statistics for Non-Statisticians
The Totally Organized Professional Is All About Outcomes
Why EBITDA Doesn't Spell Cash Flow and What Does
GAMP5, Second Edition and Alignment with Computer Software …
Project Management for Non-Project Managers - Scheduling yo…
Sunshine Act Reporting - Clarification for Clinical Research
Understanding the Math of HR… So You Can Show How HR Impact…
FFIEC BSA/AML Examination Manual: What Compliance Officers …
How to Address ISO's New Climate Change Requirements
I-9 Audits: Strengthening Your Immigration Compliance Strat…
Re-imagine Finance & Accounting Made Simple. Three Webinars…
Stay Interviews: A Powerful and Low-Cost Employee Engagemen…
How To Conduct An Internal Harassment And Bullying Investig…
Effective Onboarding: How to Welcome, Engage, and Retain Ne…
Managing Toxic & Other Employees Who Have Attitude Issues
Analytical Method Validation Under Good Laboratory Practic…
Do's and Don'ts of Documenting Employee Behaviour, Performa…
Do's and Don'ts of Giving Effective Feedback for Performanc…
Onboarding New Hires: Leverage the Potential of Artificial …
Project Management for HR, Administrative Professionals, an…
Tattoos, hijabs, piercings, and pink hair: The challenges …
Using Behavior Based Interviewing for Finding the Best Matc…
How to Document Employee Discussions and Why it is Important
Stressed Out: How to Handle Conflict, Difficult People and …
Harassment, Bullying, Gossip, Confrontational and Disruptiv…
Best Practices for Working With Vendors and Suppliers
Understanding the Artificial Intelligence Landscape
Marketing to Medicare or Medicaid Beneficiaries - What You …
Accounting For Non Accountants : Debit, Credits And Financi…
Principles & Practices for the Cybersecurity of Legacy Medi…
Independent Contractor vs. Employee New Rule Issued by The …
Ultimate Persuasion Strategies! - Secret Influence Tools & …
Kicking your Employee Retention Efforts into Overdrive: Sta…